Skip to main content

National Security

<span>
<p>As the father of four sons currently serving in the military and a 31-year veteran of the South Carolina Army National Guard, I have always been an enthusiastic and ardent supporter of our brave men and women in uniform.&nbsp; As Chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel and a member of the&nbsp;<a href="http://armedservices.house.gov/">House Committee on Armed Services</a>, I am very grateful to have the opportunity to work on the national security challenges our nation faces.</p>
<p>After our country was attacked on September 11, 2001, we woke up in a new era of conflict where our soldiers are now working throughout the world to prevent additional acts of terrorism against the American people and our country's interests.&nbsp; U.S. troops risk their lives daily, in Afghanistan and beyond, as they face terrorists abroad so that we do not have to face them on the streets of America.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Due to the passage of the Budget Control Act of 2011 last July, the Department of Defense is expected to suffer an automatic across-the-board $500 billion budget cut, also known as Sequestration. These cuts will not be used to reduce our growing national deficit, but instead will be shifted from defense to other departments and agencies. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has warned that such a drastic decrease will result in the smallest Navy since the beginning of World War I, smallest Army and Marine Corps since the beginning of World War II and the smallest Air Force since it was created. Not only will these cuts threaten our national security, military strength, and defense capabilities, it will also destroy approximately one million jobs across our country while sending a message to enemies we lack resolve to resist their attacks.</p>
<p>In terms of overall defense spending, South Carolina ranks eleventh nationally as it is 5.7 percent of our gross domestic product. Because of its large military presence, South Carolina’s economy is heavily influenced by the defense industry. In 2013 alone, our State could lose up to $481 million in defense contracts and our military personnel may decrease by 7,500. If the sequestration budget cuts go into full affect, thousands of private sector jobs will be destroyed. </p>
<p>Many Members of Congress with different backgrounds and different constituencies may disagree about the best way to protect our Nation.&nbsp; However, it is Congress' Constitutional responsibility to ensure our troops receive the best resources available to keep them safe at home and abroad.&nbsp; We must ensure that there is no interruption or restriction of funding for American troops in combat zones.&nbsp; Throughout the past year, I have made my opposition to Sequestration very clear. We MUST replace the impending cuts to our defense by cutting other unnecessary, government over-reaching programs that are not in place to protect our national security. Earlier this year, I held a Sequestration Roundtable Discussion in Columbia, and heard concerns from business people, community leaders, and military officials across our State who are worried about the real threat sequestration will have on our economy and national defense. &nbsp;In May 2012, I was proud to support H.R. 5652, the Sequester Replacement Reconciliation Act of 2012, which replaces the defense budget cuts with common-sense reforms, while sending a clear message to the Administration: We will not put our national security at risk by allowing the President to shift money away from the Department of Defense in order to advance his liberal agenda.&nbsp; Unfortunately, this bill remains stalled in the liberal-controlled Senate awaiting action.</p>
<p>The United States military has successfully remained the most superior power in the world by practicing President Ronald Reagan’s national security approach of providing peace through strength. It is no accident America has not been attacked in more than 11 years.&nbsp;No matter the legislation before me, I will always fight to make sure our soldiers have the equipment and funding they need to do the job we have asked of them, which is to keep the American people safe from foreign threats.</p>
<br />
</span>

September 4, 2013

Congressman Joe Wilson (SC-02), Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and Chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel, issued the following statement after questioning Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey at the House Foreign Affairs Committee Hearing on a potentia


August 7, 2013
Editorial
Your editorial citing "Budget cuts are hurting military" is on point, but your assertion that sequestration was conjured by Republicans is incorrect. On page 342 of Bob Woodward's book, "The Price of Politics," sequestration is attributed to the president. In fact, House Republicans voted twice last year to avoid the sequester and addressed the issue in this year's House passed budget.
Issues:National Security

August 1, 2013

Rep. Joe Wilson (SC), Chairman of the Military Personnel Subcommittee, made the following opening statement as prepared for delivery at a hearing on Department of Defense's Challenges in Accounting for Missing Persons from Past Conflicts.


July 24, 2013

Rep. Joe Wilson (SC), Chairman of the Military Personnel Subcommittee, made the following opening statement as prepared for delivery at a hearing on Women in Service Reviews.


July 11, 2013

Congressman Joe Wilson (SC-02) released the following statement after the House passed H.R. 2609, the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2014.


June 19, 2013

Congressman Joe Wilson (SC-02) released the following in response to President Obama's remarks in Berlin, Germany where he called on Russia to enter into bilateral negotiations to reduce our strategic nuclear warhead arsenal by one-third beyond the levels set by the New START treaty.


June 14, 2013

Congressman Joe Wilson (SC-02) issued the following statement after the House passed H.R. 1960, the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2014. This bill authorizes and prioritizes funding for the Department of Defense (DOD) and other select national security programs within the Department of Energy (DOE) for FY2014.


June 6, 2013

House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel Chairman Joe Wilson issued the following statement after the House Armed Services Committee passed the Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (FY14 NDAA):


May 15, 2013

Congressman Joe Wilson (SC-02) issued the following statement after Congress approved the reprogram request submitted by the Savannah River Site:


May 14, 2013

House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel Chairman Joe Wilson (SC-02) issued the following statement regarding allegations of criminal behavior against a sexual assault prevention and response coordinator stationed at Fort Hood: